/
/
We investigated the effects of divided attention during walking. Individuals were classified based on whether they were walking while talking on a cell phone, listening to an MP3 player, walking without any electronics or walking in a pair. In the first study, we found that cell phone users walked more slowly, changed directions more frequently, and were less likely to acknowledge other people than individuals in the other conditions. In the second study, we found that cell phone users were less likely to notice an unusual activity along their walking route (a unicycling clown). Cell phone usage may cause inattentional blindness even during a simple activity that should require few cognitive resources./
/
Writing is a complex cognitive process relying on intricate perceptual-sensorimotor combinations. The process and skill of writing is studied on several levels and in many disciplines, from neurophysiological research on the shaping of each letter to studies on stylistic and compositional features of authors and poets. In studies of writing and literacy overall, the role of the physically tangible writing device (pen on paper; computer mouse and keyboard; digital stylus pen and writing tablet; etc.) is rarely addressed. By and large, the (relatively young) field of writing research is dominated by cognitive approaches predominantly focusing on the visual component of the writing process, hence maintaining a separation between (visual) perception and motor action (e.g., haptics1). However, recent theoretical currents in psychology, phenomenology & philosophy of mind, and neuroscience – commonly referred to as “embodied cognition” – indicate that perception and motor action are closely connected and, indeed, reciprocally dependent./
ABSTRACT/
abstract/
The objective is to estimate the impact of digital media on human society in June 2019 (AE49)./
ABSTRACT Our smartphones enable—and encourage—constant connection to information, entertainment, and each other. They put the world at our fingertips, and rarely leave our sides. Although these devices have immense potential to improve welfare, their persistent presence may come at a cognitive cost. In this research, we test the “brain drain” hypothesis that the mere presence of one’s own smartphone may occupy limited-capacity cognitive resources, thereby leaving fewer resources available for other tasks and undercutting cognitive performance. Results from two experiments indicate that even when people are successful at maintaining sustained attention—as when avoiding the temptation to check their phones—the mere presence of these devices reduces available cognitive capacity. Moreover, these cognitive costs are highest for those highest in smartphone dependence. We conclude by discussing the practical implications of this smartphone-induced brain drain for consumer decision-making and consumer welfare./
Abstract/
ABSTRACT/
The goal is to sharpen Your awareness concerning the interaction between humans and machines./
Date | Topic |
---|---|
12.4 | Introduction |
19.4 | NO COURSE (Karfreitag) |
26.4 | How to read scientific articles |
3.5 | Google, Brain & co. |
10.5 | Cognitive sciences |
17.5 | Cognitive psychology |
24.5 | Abstracts |
31.5 | OPTIONAL COURSE (Christihimmelfahrt Brückentag) |
7.6 | Memetic theory |
14.6 | Theory of multiple intelligences |
21.6 | Developmental aspects |
28.6 | Socrates & Gestalt |
5.7 | Symposion |
12.7 | Summa Summarum |
/
Please choose one among following experiments on presentation/realisation of which You shall participate.